Nº. 1 of  4

What's Past Is Prologue

My name is Ryan and I tell stories. I'm just a gangly kid with big shoes and bigger dreams.

Posts tagged politics:

Things That Are More Popular than the United States Congress

  • A cactus enema
  • Communism
  • Fascism
  • Nazism
  • Communazifemisocialecobuddhism
  • The works of Stephenie Meyer
  • The works of E.L. James
  • The weird fanfiction that pairs Edward Cullen with that vampire from Fifty Shades of Grey
  • The weird fanfiction that pairs Stephenie Meyer with E.L. James
  • The fact that there is a city named Forty Fort, Pennsylvania
  • A second cactus enema
  • MySpace
  • Facebook’s IPO
  • MySpace’s IPO
  • The Office but without Michael Scott and with lots of James Spader and Will Ferrell’s characters
  • Whitney but with everything exactly the same
  • Asif Ali Zardari and Hamid Karzai dancing to “Single Ladies” even though that song came out in, like, 2008 and does anyone who has”Single Ladies” on their iTunes know who Zardari and Karzai are, because they’re not even all that sure.
  • The Heckscher-Ohlin model of general equilibrium
  • Singalongs with the Westboro Baptist Church
  • Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall
  • A third cactus enema

Because like, that’s what we’ve been saying, but then you guys say it’s socialism, so…

(ALSO CAN WE TALK ABOUT HOW LIKE THEY WANT TO KEEP PUSHING UP DEFENSE SPENDING BUT THEY DON’T WANT TO RAISE TAXES ALONG WITH IT? YOU GUYS, I NEARLY FAILED COLLEGE ALGEBRA AND I KNOW THAT DOESN’T ADD UP!)

I promise you non-political content will be coming back to this blog… once I finish writing my novel…

I disagree with the idea of “moderates” in politics being inherently correct, because this assumes that a middle ground between both parties is where we want to be.

When the Republican Party is so far to the right that they’re rubbing elbows with Benito Mussolini, “centrism” still puts you comfortably in the right wing.

cheatsheet:

In our latest Op-Vid animation, David Frum takes a look at the catastrophic gridlock we’re facing in DC

I have a lot of skepticism regarding David Frum. He was President Bush the Younger’s speechwriter who coined the onerous phrase “axis of evil.” He’s very much a conservative. But he’s also befuddled by the intransigence of the Republican Congress, and — for all his bombast — seems to favor compromise over rigid ideology.

I just finished Robert Draper’s Do Not Ask What Good We Do, an account of the antics of the first year of the 112th Congress. As someone itching to move to Washington and start work in the federal government, I found it highly illuminating. That book, coupled with this video, is essentially saying something that I am going to mince now:

We’re fucked if this shit keeps going on.

In Which I Am Monumentally Disgusted

Alternative Title: I Am Not Going to Shut Up About Congressional Politics for a Few Minutes

So for those of you who don’t know, don’t care, or don’t have an American citizenship, Republicans and Democrats in Congress agreed upon a cut budget last year. The President called it “eating your peas,” but what he really meant to say is “the Democrats will eat their peas and have the things they want cut while the Republicans just stand around looking smug.”

Anyway, the United States House of Representatives just passed a $642 billion budget for the Defense Department. (That’s $642, followed by nine zeroes.) Among the provisos of the budget are funds for the construction of a missile defense site on the East Coast, a ban on reducing America’s nuclear arsenal, and a reaffirmation of the indefinite detention without trial of terrorism suspects. While the Obama Administration has been slow to move on that last item, it should be noted that the United States and Russia signed an agreement to reduce their nuclear stockpiles (passed before the current benighted Congress ambled into Washington to be total dickheads), and the military opposes the construction of a “missile defense site” on the East Coast.

But the real kicker here? The President, the Senate, and the House all agreed to a budget that was $8 billion less than what the House GOP caucus proposed. I realize in a budget of $642 billion, $8 billion is only slightly more than one tenth of one percent of the budget. When you’re talking about hundreds of billions of dollars, one teeny tiny single-digit billion doesn’t make an enormous difference. Does it?

It totally does when the party proposing this budget sailed into power protesting “runaway spending” and promising to slash the budget left, right, and center. Republican Paul Ryan of Wisconsin proposed a plan that would decimate Medicare and Medicaid; Republicans throughout Congress found enough umbrage to angrily denounce Planned Parenthood’s federal funding. (For the 2008/2009 fiscal year, Planned Parenthood received about $70 million in federal funding, and an additional $293 million in Medicare funding, which mixes federal and state loans.) This is the party that promised to restore America’s pocketbook.

Of course, what a Republican promises and what a Republican delivers are two different things entirely. Two years ago, during the Michigan gubernatorial election, I considered voting Republican; the Democratic nominee wasn’t doing much for me, and the Republican nominee promised a lot of nice things about governing the state sensibly, not ideologically. Of course, when Republican Rick Snyder won, he proceeded to rubber-stamp the radical Republican agenda coming out of the Michigan legislature. Working in that branch of government for the first year of the Snyder Administration was like watching every Republican wet dream come true.

If there is one thing I’ve learned from watching politics, it’s this: Never, never, never trust a Republican. This is not a party Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Dwight D. Eisenhower would recognize — hell, even St. Ronald Reagan wouldn’t recognize the Republican Party today. It is beholden to a rigid ideology that refuses to compromise on any issue and tries to make any elected official with policy that differs from that ideology (i.e., any Democrat) irrelevant.

You want to be serious about cutting the budget? Fine, let’s sit down and talk about it. But don’t demonize the Democratic Party, the President of the United States, and Democratic Members of Congress for spending too much and then propose — let alone pass — a budget that is higher than what was agreed upon. Whenever the House Republicans wind up in the news, I keep on waiting to hear the other shoe dropping. Then I realize that it dropped in November of 2010, and all I can really hear is the mating call of the House GOP caucus: TROLOLOLOL.

So I know I’m pretty sycophantically devoted to President Obama, but damn. Positive ad is positive! Not even a single mention of Governor Romney.

President cites killing of bin Laden after ten years: Republicans freak out. George W. Bush dons fighter pilot suit, hops into military jet, lands on aircraft carrier amidst hundreds of U.S. troops, steps up to podium in front of big-ass banner emblazoned with words “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED” and declares end of offensive operations about eight years BEFORE war actually ends: Republicans say absolutely nothing.

I just need to say that of course the killing of Osama bin Laden is a political act. Of course it is. Republicans are essentially getting pissed off because they can’t counter it with anything. They just have to say that the president is being unfair, that it was a nonpartisan event.

Really? Really? It was a nonpartisan event? Sorry, you lost the ability to claim that one years ago.

I am all for being the grown ups in the room, but you can only be grown ups when both sides follow the same rules. The Republicans aren’t following any sort of code of honor; to hold the Democrats to a higher standard is foolish, because that’s just impolitic.

(Source: inothernews)

Thoughts About College and Parks and Recreation

I finished my last college class this morning. It was a 400-level class on international security, the capstone of my international relations degree. It was the only class I legitimately enjoyed all semester — actually, the only class I consistently enjoyed all school year.

I’ve often felt like I’m fighting an internal battle between my writing and everything else. Writer is the first word I use to describe myself, before my name, before my gender, before my age, even before human. My head is full of words, and I feel like an archaeologist sometimes, unearthing them fully-formed. Communication has not once been a problem for me; I always say exactly what I mean.

So it would almost seem natural for me to study something that was directly related to this. After all, I would (at the very least) excel academically at it. I was the star of every English class I set foot in, impressing every writing teacher I’ve ever known. I won the English Student of the Year award for my graduating class, and the superintendent of the school district singled me out in her speech that year for my writing.

But I made a conscious choice to study public policy. It has not been easy, it has not been something I have always enjoyed. I fought hard for grades that are lower than what I would undoubtedly get if I were studying something I am so naturally gifted in. It sometimes seemed like I didn’t like half my classes — my father said as much to me at the start of my junior year of college. “If you wanted to change majors now, we would be okay with you staying in school for another year.”

But I didn’t want to change my major, because I believe in public service. I have been incredibly blessed from the moment I was born. I wouldn’t say I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth, but I have not once known want, or fear that I wouldn’t have enough. There was always food on the table, the house was always warm, the Christmas tree always cluttered with gifts. I am the adored only child of a wealthy older couple, and that is by and large situational. I didn’t earn that.

And I believe more people can have the things I did, if the men and women who make public policy work for it. I believe our natural inclinations are not towards the bottom line, are not towards profit, are not towards a lower tax rate. Do we really have such a narrow conception of freedom as to say it is having a 13% tax rate on an eight figure income? Call me crazy, but my imagination is bigger than that.

On tonight’s episode of Parks and Recreation, Paul Rudd’s character dropped a bomb: If Leslie Knope won the city council election, his dad would move the town’s biggest source of jobs to Mexico. Leslie was stunned, unsure of what to do — she only had her closing statement left. When it was finally her turn to speak, she said:

I’m very angry. I’m angry that Bobby Newport would hold this town hostage and threaten to leave if you don’t give him what he wants. It’s despicable. Corporations are not allowed to dictate what a city needs. That power belongs to the people. Bobby Newport and his daddy would like you to think it belongs to them. I love this town, and when you love something you don’t threaten it. You don’t punish it. You fight for it, you take care of it, you put it first. As your City Councilor, I’ll make sure that no one takes advantage of Pawnee. If I seem too passionate, it’s because I care. If I come on strong, it’s because I feel strongly, and if I push too hard, it’s because things aren’t moving fast enough. This is my home, you are my family, and I promise you, I’m not going anywhere.

Yes, I’m slovenly liberal, but when I heard that I damn near teared up. Leslie Knope (well, Amy Poehler, who wrote and directed tonight’s brilliant episode) articulated everything I believe about government. Government is about putting people first, it’s about putting your home first.

I am so angry that I came of age in the middle of the worst recession since the Great Depression. I am pissed that I’m graduating in nine days, just when reports are saying one in two college graduates this year are going to be unemployed or underemployed. I am beyond frustrated that my major is listed as one of the “worst” in college in terms of job prospects. I have sent out resume after resume, and I haven’t gotten a response.

And what makes me even more mad is that the people who did this are yelling at the guy trying to fix it, and they want to go back to the way things were. I don’t buy that argument. I don’t believe in policies that reward the richest, that hurt everyone else; I don’t believe in politics that vilify everyone who doesn’t look like me; I don’t believe in that America.

I believe these things so steadfastly that I made the conscious choice to do what I can to help. That is what college has taught me.

I think part of the real problem in this country — and Jon Huntsman articulated it nicely the other day, much to the annoyance of the Republican Party — is the different levels the two parties are willing to deviate from the message.
It is unthinkable for a Republican to criticize another Republican. That’s Ronald Reagan’s famous 11th Commandment: “Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican.” Democrats are willing to blast other Democrats, Republicans are unwilling to speak out against each other.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi put it nicely when she said:

“When the Republican leadership tells its members, ‘there is a blue cup on the table,’ every Republican repeats, ‘there is a blue cup on the table.’ When I tell my fellow Democrats, ‘there is a blue cup on the table,’ one will say ‘there is a blue cup on a round table.’ Another will say, ‘there is a blue cup next to Nancy Pelosi’s cup.’ Another: ‘a blue cup on a brown table.’”

I’m not entirely a believer in a “liberal media conspiracy.” I think there are plenty of (loud) conservative voices in the media — Fox News and the Wall Street Journal spring to mind immediately. Even “liberal” publications like the New York Times frequently run editorials by conservatives — Bill Kristol is one of the most noisome neoconservatives around, and he had a weekly column in the New York Times for a long while.
But I believe people are people, and people are biased, so yes, there are liberal media institutions and there are conservative media institutions. But the liberal ones are much, much, much more willing to speak critically of their allies, while the conservative ones remain in lockstep with St. Reagan’s 11th Commandment.

I think part of the real problem in this country — and Jon Huntsman articulated it nicely the other day, much to the annoyance of the Republican Party — is the different levels the two parties are willing to deviate from the message.

It is unthinkable for a Republican to criticize another Republican. That’s Ronald Reagan’s famous 11th Commandment: “Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican.” Democrats are willing to blast other Democrats, Republicans are unwilling to speak out against each other.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi put it nicely when she said:

“When the Republican leadership tells its members, ‘there is a blue cup on the table,’ every Republican repeats, ‘there is a blue cup on the table.’ When I tell my fellow Democrats, ‘there is a blue cup on the table,’ one will say ‘there is a blue cup on a round table.’ Another will say, ‘there is a blue cup next to Nancy Pelosi’s cup.’ Another: ‘a blue cup on a brown table.’”

I’m not entirely a believer in a “liberal media conspiracy.” I think there are plenty of (loud) conservative voices in the media — Fox News and the Wall Street Journal spring to mind immediately. Even “liberal” publications like the New York Times frequently run editorials by conservatives — Bill Kristol is one of the most noisome neoconservatives around, and he had a weekly column in the New York Times for a long while.

But I believe people are people, and people are biased, so yes, there are liberal media institutions and there are conservative media institutions. But the liberal ones are much, much, much more willing to speak critically of their allies, while the conservative ones remain in lockstep with St. Reagan’s 11th Commandment.

(Source: inothernews)

Doing As We’re Told

We did everything right. We did our homework in junior high school, because we were told, “In high school, homework will be a lot harder.”

We did our homework in high school, too, so we would be prepared for the tests. We knew we needed to do well on the tests, because if we didn’t, it would hurt our GPAs. “If you have a low GPA, you won’t get into a good college,” they told us.

And then we did it, we finished high school. Some of us did better than others, but we were eager and willing. We listened to what our guidance counselors and teachers and parents said; we toured college campuses and  we filled out applications at the start of senior year, we waited for acceptance letters. We applied for scholarships and student loans and filled out our roommate preference forms.

But all the while the mantra was This is what you’re supposed to be doing. You graduate from high school and you go to college. That is just what you do. I told my parents I wanted to be an author. “That’s nice,” they said, “but not very practical. Get a degree instead, and then maybe, if you have time later, you can write those books.”

And so we went to college, because that’s what smart go-getters did. We signed up for our first classes, we learned quickly which classes you could blow off and when, where you should go for parties to relieve the stress of a college education, we met more and more new people, all excited about their own futures. We declared our majors - some of us in “impractical” fields to spite our parents, others of us doing more mundane things like chemistry, public policy, or business.

We took our tests. We wrote our papers. We went to lab, we did our assignments, we bought roughly $3,000 worth of coursebooks every year, but hey, that’s just what you do. We tried our best to be engaged citizens while still living in the bubble of college, brushing aside reports of rising joblessness, of weaker economies, of worsening debt. We were all aware of it, but we were doing what we were supposed to do

We took internships. We studied abroad. We did work experience. I worked in a legislative office for a year and then spent three months as an unpaid intern with a political party. Friends volunteered at hospitals, in labs, at banks, in South Africa, in Ireland - all with the promise that this was valuable experience, that these résumés we were building would make us competitive and attractive to the job market.

And then senior year arrived, and we met with our career advisers. “What do I do to get a job?” we asked, and they obliged, providing us with the information. They double-checked our résumés and cover letters and directed us to alumni, to career fairs, to job search engines. “Good luck!” they said, and they meant it.

And we applied for jobs. We looked for the ones we really wanted, in the fields we dreamed about when we first picked our colleges when we were still in high school because that was how it was done. And then we zapped our applications off to them, with sterling references to boot, because we did our internships and our homework and had good GPAs and the admiration of bosses and professors.

And then nothing. Maybe, three weeks later, we’d hear back, something terse and impersonal: “Over 300 people applied for this position, so we had to be selective in who we chose to interview.” Sometimes they were vaguely impolite: “We only invited the most qualified candidates in for an interview, and you were not among those.” Often, they just wouldn’t write back at all.

And then we gave the numbers a second look over. Only 54% of Americans aged 18 to 24 are employed; if you take a group of you and ten of your friends, almost half of you will not have a job.”What gives?” we ask. “We did our homework, we went to college, we did our internships, we took on this massive amount of student debt - and now you won’t hire us?”

“Sorry,” the job market says, avoiding our accusing glares. “Times are tight. There aren’t a lot of jobs to go around. We’re only hiring people with Masters degrees, with doctorates, for these positions.”

“Five years ago you were hiring undergrads,” we point out, a little exhausted. After all, applying for thirty or forty or fifty jobs without any acceptance is wearisome.

“Five years ago was five years ago. Sorry.”

So now here we are, about to move on to the next part of the game, but there’s nowhere to go. We stuff our hands in our pockets and come knocking on Mom and Dad’s door; it may be undignified, it may be frustrating, it may be humiliating, but hey, at least Mom and Dad have a spare room and will feed you. All we have to do is ignore those pointed questions like, “Why haven’t you found a job yet? Shouldn’t you have interviewed? Maybe you’re applying for jobs that you aren’t qualified for - maybe you should aim lower. Your cousin found a job last week. If you find a job in town, you can still live with us for the next few years - wouldn’t that be great?”

And we listen to them and don’t know what to do, because we did everything they told us and they were wrong.

My name is Ryan. I am graduating from college in a little more than three weeks, and I am about to be unemployed.

[College students graduating in the year 2012 are worse off than they were graduating in 1992. The number of young Americans employed right now is the lowest on record. The longer we’re unemployed, the worse it is for our country, but because of the recession and budget cuts at the private and public levels, fewer places are willing to hire us. If we remain unemployed for the first 10 months after graduation, 15 years on we are twice as likely to be unemployed and, if we are working, we will earn $10,000 less than what we might have made. This crisis is not of our making, and nobody is doing anything to fix it.]

Nº. 1 of  4